Saturday, January 30, 2010

Defining Service Provider Selection Criteria

A few weeks ago, I listened as a client described a failed outsourcing project and the difficult situation they were in as a result. They had not defined their business needs and selection criteria carefully before determining which provider to negotiate with. Their selection was based upon personal relationships, past bad experiences, and some marketing hype. They ended up trying to strike a deal with a provider that not only could not meet their needs, but they didn't find that out until they were well into negotiations. They cancelled the transaction, which cost them hundreds of thousand of dollars in consulting and legal fees, and put themselves in a very precarious position operationally. I wish I could say that this situation is unusual, but unfortunately, I have seen it many times in my consulting career.

Determining selection criteria before deciding who you want to invite to the outsourcing negotiations table is not rocket science. In fact, it is such a seemingly mundane task, that most people just skip it. The problem is that in a company where outsourcing is being considered, there are multiple forces at work -- people making decisions based on internal, unspoken criteria or old prejudices, or perhaps making recommendations that will scuttle the deal for personal reasons. So taking the time to identify your goals and business needs, and the objective criteria by which your team will make a decision, can help take the decision out of the realm of the emotional and into the realm of practical, business decisions.

One way to approach this is to develop your selection criteria as a team, and then jointly rank and weight these so that you can assign value to each of the criteria you will use to evaluate the providers. For example, you may have both price and technical solution as part of your evaluation criteria, but which one is more important? Are you willing to pay more for a better technical solution or capabilities? Or is cost the most important criteria? You may have difficulty making these decisions, but it is far better to make these decisions up front before you embark on service provider identification.
Your business and sourcing strategy drives the selection criteria, which will drive the identification and selection of the provider. If you choose your list of providers before you have completed these strategy steps and have internal agreement, you will most likely find, in retrospect, that you have omitted some very good candidates, and included a few that clearly don’t match up.

Once you have your selection criteria identified, ranked and rated, you may want to identify any criteria that are minimum requirements or showstoppers. If there are criteria that the provider must meet in order to bid on your deal, you can save yourself time by making these criteria the first pass at selection. For example, if your company can only do business with companies that are based in a particular geography or that are of a certain size, then these criteria become an automatic disqualifier if they are not met.
You should investigate each of the companies on the potential provider list to ensure they meet your basic criteria before you engage with them. This is an activity you can have your internal team perform, or you can procure the services of an external advisor to help you with this activity. You don’t need to take a service provider through a proposal process to find out that it doesn’t meet the basic qualifications for selection.

While you are working on this initial task, it is important to take another kind of internal survey: are there any providers on there that your company, for whatever reason, cannot or will not do business with? This is sometimes a bit of a challenge, but the usual place to start here is with the executive committee. There may be some strong opinions on that team about who they want to do business with, but the real question to ask is -- if this provider gives us the best proposal is there anything that would prevent us from signing a deal with them? If you uncover anything significant and cannot get it resolved, it is best to omit this provider from your list. Neither you nor the provider have time to work on something that is futile.

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Provider Selection -- How To Choose the Right One

Provider selection is perhaps the most important decision to be made in the course of a services outsourcing initiative, and also one of the most difficult. And there usually isn’t just one service provider that can deliver your services. There are usually several or perhaps dozens of highly qualified firms that can meet your needs, and your job is identify the one you want to do business with.

In these difficult economic times, clients are finding that there is tremendous competition for every sourcing opportunity they identify. With the dozens of companies vying for your business on even the smallest transaction, how do you pick the right service provider from the crowd?

I suggest that your business strategy should be the primary driver of service provider selection. Without a clear business and sourcing strategy, it is difficult, if not impossible, to select a provider that can meet your requirements. It is also easy to focus in on only one dimension of selection criteria, for example, cost, and dismiss or overlook other critical criteria for selection. Many clients these days are overlooking quality and business strategy and going straight for the easiest option -- picking the cheapest solution. This is a tempting, but short term and potentially disastrous view of sourcing. Let's discuss some of the other ways to address service provider seletion.

What parts of strategy are important to define?

Some companies focus on relationship and choose providers because they have worked with them before or because an executive in the organization has a strong relationship with the organization. Perhaps the company feels that the provider does not have the best qualifications, but they fall into the “it’s the devil we know” trap. Some fall in love with the sales team, and make their selection based on marketing ability and rapport. Others focus only on technical qualifications, and overlook the critical dimension of relationship and cultural fit.

Your selection can be made easier if your strategy and vision have been carefully defined, your team is able to communicate this information to the service providers, and you take care to review and verify that the provider not only can do what they say (ie. Have the documented capability and track record), but that they will do what they say (i.e. they are willing to accept risk of performance and put their promises and marketing blitzes in the contract).

Before you start to consider what service provider to invite to the table, make sure you are very clear on the following items:

- Business strategy
- Scope of sourcing
- Personnel and benefits goals
- Operational and Technical goals and objectives
- Degree of transformation required
- Definition of desired relationship model
-- Collaborative or tactical
- Future vision
- Service Delivery Model and approach
-- ( single or multi-source)
-- ( onshore or offshore)
-- (strategic sourcing or tactical sourcing/staff augmentation)


Your strategy will help you determine the both the number of providers selected, the characteristics of the providers selected and ultimately, the winning provider or providers. If your strategy calls for a multi-sourced or best of breed solution, you will need to select a different set of providers than if you are looking for a single source to provide all services. If your strategy calls for a innovation in technology, you will want to identify providers with that particular skill set and track record. WIthout a clear strategy, you are likely to send mixed messages to the provider community, making your task more difficult and increasing the likelihood that you may choose a provider totally unsuited for the task.

In my next blog, I will talk about how to build your selection criteria.

.